UK treasury interpretation of PSD2 access

As many have pointed out, PSD2 interpretation is going to vary. Here is an interesting example:

Article 36 of the second Payment Services Directive (PSD2) will require the Member States of the European Union to “ensure that payment institutions have access to [bank] payment accounts services on an objective, non-discriminatory and proportionate basis. Such access shall be sufficiently extensive as to allow payment institutions to provide payment services in an unhindered and efficient manner. The [bank] shall provide the competent authority with duly motivated reasons for any rejection”

Some market participants had thought this meant the banks would eventually have to make payment account services available to (eg) money remitters, and payment initiation and account information service providers, so they could make their services available to consumers in more easily than might otherwise have been the case. However, HM Treasury has told the Financial Conduct Authority’s Payment Services Stakeholder Liaison Group that it takes a different view.

Perhaps in reliance on recitals 49 to 51 of PSD2, the Treasury has decided that – subject to the outcome of a consultation process beginning shortly – it “will not mandate that [banks] provide payment services providers … with access to payment account services“. The underlying reason seems to be that article 36 only really requires the banks to “treat like applications alike”, and not much more than that. So, the banks will “need to make available criteria for assessing applications for [payment account services] to [payment services providers] requesting such access“. Then, if the bank rejects and application or withdraws a service, it will be required to give notice to the FCA with reasons, to enable the FCA to monitor article 36 compliance.

In the circumstances, the FCA has:

“invited general comments on Article 36 and the issue of access to [payment account services] for [payment service providers]“;
“requested input on what should be considered an ‘application’ for the purposes of Article 36“;
asked for “views on which [payment account services] are critical to providing payment services“; and
“confirmed that guidance on Article 36 [will] be included in the updated [FCA] Approach Document]” to the Payment Services Regulations, in due course.


Hi @ArielB welcome to Fintech Genome.
I assume UK can cherry pick what they like & don’t like in PSD2 post Brexit, but that for example Germany and France simply accept it all. Or do I have that wrong?

Hi @BernardLunn, thanks for the welcome ! enjoyed the API newsletter focus last week

I think the UK is an interesting case, as different branches of the government have been pushing for open banking and increased competition, regardless of the EU initiatives.

Looking at the EU markets, the European Banking Association wrote the following in September:

  • The PSD2 text leaves considerable room for differing national interpretations (e.g. regarding legacy elements such as unique identifiers or central reporting) and market practices, which may lead to different requirements across communities.

Source:, page 8